Today, I wrote the outline of sonic log paper.
Summary:
I will finish it when it is done today.
Tomorrow, I will start to write the paper.
2/23/2018
finish the Geophysics paper and start the sonic paper
Today, I finished the Geophysics paper and started the sonic paper.
Summary:
I sent you by an email.
Next week, I will continue to work on the sonic paper.
Summary:
I sent you by an email.
Next week, I will continue to work on the sonic paper.
2/22/2018
change the comments
Today, I changed the comments.
Summary:
I am now writing the modification part.
Tomorrow, I will finish it.
Summary:
I am now writing the modification part.
Tomorrow, I will finish it.
2/21/2018
finish the improvement
Today, I finished the improvement of the geophysics paper.
Summary:
I sent you by an email.
Tomorrow, I will improve some contents of the paper.
Summary:
I sent you by an email.
Tomorrow, I will improve some contents of the paper.
2/19/2018
continue to improve the paper
Today, I continued to improve the paper.
Summary:
I cannot finish it today. It may take another 2 or 3 days. I will try to finish it this week.
Tomorrow, I will continue to improve the paper.
Summary:
I cannot finish it today. It may take another 2 or 3 days. I will try to finish it this week.
Tomorrow, I will continue to improve the paper.
2/16/2018
finish the GJI paper
Today, I finished changing the format for GJI paper.
Summary:
I changed the format for GJI paper and continue to improve the geophysics paper.
Next week, I will continue to improve the geophysics paper.
Summary:
I changed the format for GJI paper and continue to improve the geophysics paper.
Next week, I will continue to improve the geophysics paper.
2/15/2018
continue to improve the paper
Today, I continued to improve the paper.
Summary:
I go on with another 3 comments.
Tomorrow, I will change the format of the rejected paper.
Summary:
I go on with another 3 comments.
Tomorrow, I will change the format of the rejected paper.
2/14/2018
deal with the comments of the second reviewer
Today, I dealt with the comments of the second reviewer.
Summary:
There are about 20 comments from the second reviewer. I will deal with them one by one.
Tomorrow, I will continue to deal with them.
Summary:
There are about 20 comments from the second reviewer. I will deal with them one by one.
Tomorrow, I will continue to deal with them.
2/13/2018
improve the geophysics paper
Today, I continued to improve the geophysics paper.
Summary:
I have finished answering comments from the first reviewer.
Tomorrow: I will start to deal with the second reviewer.
Summary:
I have finished answering comments from the first reviewer.
Tomorrow: I will start to deal with the second reviewer.
2/12/2018
start to improve the geophysics paper
Today, I started to improve the geophysics paper.
Summary:
I marked all comments in four colors.
I started to deal with them one by one.
I will discuss with you about them if I have problems.
Tomorrow: I will continue to improve the paper.
Summary:
I marked all comments in four colors.
I started to deal with them one by one.
I will discuss with you about them if I have problems.
Tomorrow: I will continue to improve the paper.
2/09/2018
finish the NMR paper
Today, I finished the NMR paper.
Summary:
1. I read materials of feature selection. There should be no problem of my method to evaluate the importance of inputs in the ANN model.
2. There are many models to rank the importance or select a subset of input data. However, they are all targeted for specific models. For example, SVM-RFE is for SVM model. Relief-F is for regression model. As a result, ranking importance using these models will not show the actual importance in the ANN model.
3. So I recommend to rank importance in the ANN model by using the original method.
Next week, I may start for the geophysics paper.
Summary:
1. I read materials of feature selection. There should be no problem of my method to evaluate the importance of inputs in the ANN model.
2. There are many models to rank the importance or select a subset of input data. However, they are all targeted for specific models. For example, SVM-RFE is for SVM model. Relief-F is for regression model. As a result, ranking importance using these models will not show the actual importance in the ANN model.
3. So I recommend to rank importance in the ANN model by using the original method.
Next week, I may start for the geophysics paper.
2/08/2018
change the wrong figure
Today, I changed the wrong figure.
Summary:
The day before yesterday, I plotted the importance result. But there are two problems.
1. I deleted inputs one by one without using 0 to replace them.
2. The accuracy drop was not divided by original accuracy.
I fixed them and plot the following figure, which should be no problem.
Tomorrow, I will continue to look for methods to rank importance and give you the final version of the paper.
Summary:
The day before yesterday, I plotted the importance result. But there are two problems.
1. I deleted inputs one by one without using 0 to replace them.
2. The accuracy drop was not divided by original accuracy.
I fixed them and plot the following figure, which should be no problem.
Tomorrow, I will continue to look for methods to rank importance and give you the final version of the paper.
2/07/2018
rank importance of inputs
Today, I used other ways to rank importance of inputs.
Summary:
Feature selection is one method to decrease dimension of inputs while keeping as many information of inputs as possible. It select a subset of input for model construction. As a result, it is not for ranking importance of inputs.
I found another algorithm for ranking importance, which is called ReliefF.
The following is the result:
The ranking is different from what is calculated by deleting inputs one by one. As searched online, most people analyze importance by deleting inputs one by one. So I think that the original method is more trustworthy than the ReliefF algorithm.
Tomorrow, we can discuss about the result and I plan to go on the next task, which is find clustering method for sonic log prediction model.
Summary:
Feature selection is one method to decrease dimension of inputs while keeping as many information of inputs as possible. It select a subset of input for model construction. As a result, it is not for ranking importance of inputs.
I found another algorithm for ranking importance, which is called ReliefF.
The following is the result:
Tomorrow, we can discuss about the result and I plan to go on the next task, which is find clustering method for sonic log prediction model.
2/06/2018
finish accuracy drop analysis
Today, I finished accuracy drop analysis.
Summary:
The following is the result.
Tomorrow, I will try to use other ways to rank the importance of inputs.
Summary:
The following is the result.
2/05/2018
coding for ranking inputs
Today, I coded for ranking inputs.
Summary:
I have not finished it yet. I will try to finish it tomorrow.
But my concern is that: since I have 27 inputs, deleting any one of them will not see apparent accuracy drop. So the ranking may not be feasible.
Tomorrow, I will try to run and see the results.
Summary:
I have not finished it yet. I will try to finish it tomorrow.
But my concern is that: since I have 27 inputs, deleting any one of them will not see apparent accuracy drop. So the ranking may not be feasible.
Tomorrow, I will try to run and see the results.
2/01/2018
evaluation of GMM application in accuracy analysis
Today, I did evaluation of GMM application in accuracy analysis.
Summary:
I have not coded for the whole process, so I did not know whether it will work. But we can have a try if you want.
Tomorrow: I will continue to read some materials about GMM.
Summary:
I have not coded for the whole process, so I did not know whether it will work. But we can have a try if you want.
Tomorrow: I will continue to read some materials about GMM.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)