Summary:
There are 6731 depths I use as training and testing data last week. They are from 6890 ft to 10255 ft. Today, I tried several times and select depths from 7840 ft to 10019 ft. They are more similar to each other according to lithology. Actually, I get better results from them.
The following is the prediction result of 4 con. They are predicted by 15 logging data. R2 of 4 con are 0.91, 0.90, 0.88 and 0.85, which are very high.
The following is the prediction result of 4 per. They are predicted by 15 logging data and predicted 4 con just now. R2 of 4 per are 0.66, 0.69, 0.61 and 0.62. Although they are not as high as 4 con's. But they are better than last week's results.
Tomorrow, I will try other methods to improve the prediction performance.
how are you applying what you have learnt form the papers that I shared with you. On Wednesday, I want you to give me a summary of what you have learnt from other papers and other peoples work
ReplyDeleteI have not read all of them. I will read them these days.
Deletego back to your blogs and look at my comments to this dielectric prediction. compile all my comments related to dielectric prediction and send it to me ...
ReplyDeleteOk, I will send them to you. But I have tried all of them and I know what part is useful.
Delete