Today, I adjusted models and obtain new predicted T2.
Summary:
The prediction improves a little but almost the same. I saved new T2 distribution and recorded deleted depths. Also, I have changed all data related to the accuracy if changed. So there should be no problem.
Since testing accuracy is more important than training accuracy in data analytics, I use all of testing accuracy when comparing two models. When adjusting the model, narrowing the gap between training and testing accuracy difference is considered.
Tomorrow, I will use new T2 distribution to obtain porosity, k, irreducilbe saturation and bound water in IP. Then I will compare those results with original ones after depth matching.
Since testing accuracy is more important than training accuracy in data analytics, I use all of testing accuracy when comparing two models.
ReplyDelete>>>>>>>>>> I want you to record both the accuracy.
yes, I recorded them.
Delete>>>>>>>>>> recording both the accuracy is important because you have limited data.
ReplyDeleteUsing IP to extract these paramters is important... you have to follow conceptual steps and execute them step by step... it is very important to record each and every parameter used in extracting features from NMR using IP.
ReplyDeleteOk, I will follow and obtain them step by step. Thank you for your instruction, I will try to finish all of them this week.
Delete