Today, I changed x-axis from bins to t2 in ms and recalculated R2.
Summary:
After ignoring the first several or last several points with large residuals, I improved most of the low R2 depths.
There are only 11 depths with R2 lower than 0.7 and 3 depths with R2 lower than 0.4. The lowest is 0.293 (the middle one of the second figure). I think the reason is not only for the first or last peaks but also for the bad fitting results in middle parts, which is unavoidable for this fitting functions if I need the accuracy for other depths.
The following is the new R2 distributions for all used 3055 depths.
Tomorrow, I will do depth matching for logging data and parameters data and start applying them in R.
OK.
ReplyDeleteDiscuss with yifu about the formation types along the depth... you will different NMR and log responses for different formation types...
ReplyDeletemay be predictive model needs to be aware of changes in formation type...
you can figure out changes in formation type based on the log. ...
read the Hess Paper about the formation type. Ask yifu or Hao to send you the paper by Hess on Bakken petroleum System
Ok, I will figure it out.
Delete